Decentralization and Political Institutions

نویسندگان

  • Ruben Enikolopov
  • Ekaterina Zhuravskaya
چکیده

Does fiscal decentralization lead to more efficient governance, better public goods, and higher economic growth? This paper tests hypotheses of the theoretical literature that results of decentralization depend on features of political institutions. Using data from up to 95 countries for 25 years we show that the effect of fiscal decentralization strongly depends on two aspects of political centralization: 1) strength of national party system (measured by the age of main parties and fractionalization of government parties) and 2) subordination (whether local and state executives are appointed or elected). We find solid support for Riker’s theory (1964): in developing countries, strong parties significantly improve the results of fiscal decentralization for economic growth, quality of government, and public goods provision. There is also some evidence from developing countries that administrative subordination of local to higher-level authorities improves decentralization results. ∗ We thank Alberto Alesina, Scott Gelhbach, Sergei Guriev, James Hines, Rory MacFarquhar, Gérard Roland, Andrei Shleifer, Konstantin Sonin, Barry Weingast, Luigi Zingales, two anonymous referees and seminar participants at the University of Michigan, Center for Economic and Financial Research, New Economic School, London Business School, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Advance Study in Princeton, Harvard University, Princeton University, and participants of CEPR-WDI 2003 Transition Conference for useful comments. The work of Ruben Enikolopov was in part supported by a program of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State, administered by the American Council for International Education. The views expressed herein are of the authors and not necessarily shared by ECA or AC. ∗∗ Harvard University and Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), [email protected]. ∗∗∗ Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton; Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR); and CEPR, [email protected].

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Non-electoral Political Participation, Mobilization and Political Opportunity Structure in Western Democracies

The contextual theory of political participation in non-electoral politics developed in this paper supposes that more open political opportunity structure of a respective state increases both, the individual non-electoral participation and mobilization into this participation, since the decentralized political institutions send a message that more access points to influence politics are availab...

متن کامل

Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: Political Aspects of Decentralization and Economic Development

— This essay contributes to second generation fiscal federalism (SGFF), which traces the implications of incentives created by political and fiscal institutions. The approach explores how various forms of fiscal federalism work in the presence of political officials who, rather than being benevolent social planners, face various forms of political incentives. The paper focuses on three sets of ...

متن کامل

Pitfalls of Power to the People: Decentralization, Local Government Performance, and System Support in Bolivia

Across the developing world, many governments have implemented political reforms—heavily promoted by international donors—designed to transfer greater power to subnational levels of government and to provide a more substantial policymaking and oversight role to citizens. Although economic analyses have frequently argued that such decentralization programs improve the efficiency of public expend...

متن کامل

Analytical Study on Necessity of Decentralization of Higher Education (Iran –Tehran 2013)

Large cities and metropolitan areas in developing countries are growing rapidly. These areas grew by attracting all facilities, services and capital of the country. Tehran has been the major city and center for decision and policy making in various administrative, political, economic and socialaspects. This political focus has brought economic, social, educational focus that attracted a vast ma...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003